Knowledge Sharing Pattern Language
Pattern
KSP23
Not Wasted
| |||
|
Problem | Requirements for a new project must be defined, but time available is very limited. |
Initial Context | A new project is planned or is starting and requirements need to be defined. Sets of Reference Requirements (KSP07) exist. |
Roles | A Project Manager or Requirements Manager defining requirements. Organization represented by a person being the named owner for the reference requirements sets. |
Forces |
Requirements for a project are normally defined under strict time pressure. If then, some earlier defined and tested sets of requirements could be used, it would shorten the required time period and also result in more quality requirements compared to the situation where all requirements have to be defined starting from scratch. When using existing requirements the intellectual property rights (IPR) must be checked. Some projects might be such that the rights belong to the customers. Those requirements are not allowed to be used unless a permit has been obtained from the customer. Using existing requirements or use case components will gain a number of benefits. Jacobson et al. (1997, pp. 117-118) have listed the following benefits from the perspective of reusing use case components:
Reuse of requirements can be direct, where a requirement from one system is taken as a requirement with minimal changes, or it can be indirect, where existing requirements are used to prompt users for their specific requirements (Sommerville & Sawyer 1997, pp. 106-107). |
Solution |
To use reference requirements:
|
Resulting Context | Quickly and effectively defined requirements and through earlier tested requirements improved quality compared to starting from scratch. |
Instances |
Pattern to be used always when defining requirements. Maintenance should be continuous during the lifetime of the reference requirements set. One potential pitfall is to use a reference requirements set, that is not really applicable but needs a lot of tailoring. |
Process Connection | Software engineering, requirements definition. |
References
Clements, P. and Northrop, L. (2002). Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley.
Jacobson, I., Griss, M. and Jonsson, P. (1997). Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley.
Sommerville, I and Sawyer, P. (1997). Requirements Engineering: A good practice guide. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
Last changes at 20th July 2007